- Art. 6Classification rules for high-risk AI systems
- Art. 7Amendments to Annex III
- Art. 8Compliance with the requirements
- Art. 9Risk management system
- Art. 10Data and data governance
- Art. 11Technical documentation
- Art. 12Record-keeping
- Art. 13Transparency and provision of information to deployers
- Art. 14Human oversight
- Art. 15Accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity
- Art. 16Obligations of providers of high-risk AI systems
- Art. 17Quality management system
- Art. 18Documentation keeping
- Art. 19Automatically generated logs
- Art. 20Corrective actions and duty of information
- Art. 21Cooperation with competent authorities
- Art. 22Authorised representatives of providers of high-risk AI systems
- Art. 23Obligations of importers
- Art. 24Obligations of distributors
- Art. 25Responsibilities along the AI value chain
- Art. 26Obligations of deployers of high-risk AI systems
- Art. 27Fundamental rights impact assessment for high-risk AI systems
- Art. 28Notifying authorities
- Art. 29Application of a conformity assessment body for notification
- Art. 30Notification procedure
- Art. 31Requirements relating to notified bodies
- Art. 32Presumption of conformity with requirements relating to notified bodies
- Art. 33Subsidiaries of notified bodies and subcontracting
- Art. 34Operational obligations of notified bodies
- Art. 35Identification numbers and lists of notified bodies
- Art. 36Changes to notifications
- Art. 37Challenge to the competence of notified bodies
- Art. 38Coordination of notified bodies
- Art. 39Conformity assessment bodies of third countries
- Art. 40Harmonised standards and standardisation deliverables
- Art. 41Common specifications
- Art. 42Presumption of conformity with certain requirements
- Art. 43Conformity assessment
- Art. 44Certificates
- Art. 45Information obligations of notified bodies
- Art. 46Derogation from conformity assessment procedure
- Art. 47EU declaration of conformity
- Art. 48CE marking
- Art. 49Registration
- Art. 51Classification of general-purpose AI models as general-purpose AI models with systemic risk
- Art. 52Procedure
- Art. 53Obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models
- Art. 54Authorised representatives of providers of general-purpose AI models
- Art. 55Obligations of providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk
- Art. 56Codes of practice
- Art. 57AI regulatory sandboxes
- Art. 58Detailed arrangements for, and functioning of, AI regulatory sandboxes
- Art. 59Further processing of personal data for developing certain AI systems in the public interest in the AI regulatory sandbox
- Art. 60Testing of high-risk AI systems in real world conditions outside AI regulatory sandboxes
- Art. 60aTesting of high-risk AI systems covered by Union harmonisation legislation listed in Section B of Annex I in real-world conditions outside AI regulatory sandboxes
- Art. 61Informed consent to participate in testing in real world conditions outside AI regulatory sandboxes
- Art. 62Measures for providers and deployers, in particular SMEs, including start-ups
- Art. 63Derogations for specific operators
- Art. 64AI Office
- Art. 65Establishment and structure of the European Artificial Intelligence Board
- Art. 66Tasks of the Board
- Art. 67Advisory forum
- Art. 68Scientific panel of independent experts
- Art. 69Access to the pool of experts by the Member States
- Art. 70Designation of national competent authorities and single points of contact
- Art. 72Post-market monitoring by providers and post-market monitoring plan for high-risk AI systems
- Art. 73Reporting of serious incidents
- Art. 74Market surveillance and control of AI systems in the Union market
- Art. 75Market surveillance and control of AI systems and mutual assistance
- Art. 75aSupervisory and enforcement powers of the AI Office
- Art. 75bCommitments
- Art. 75cNon-compliance, fines and periodic penalty payments
- Art. 75dSafeguards and further specification
- Art. 76Supervision of testing in real world conditions by market surveillance authorities
- Art. 77Powers of authorities protecting fundamental rights and cooperation with market surveillance authorities
- Art. 78Confidentiality
- Art. 79Procedure at national level for dealing with AI systems presenting a risk
- Art. 80Procedure for dealing with AI systems classified by the provider as non-high-risk in application of Annex III
- Art. 81Union safeguard procedure
- Art. 82Compliant AI systems which present a risk
- Art. 83Formal non-compliance
- Art. 84Union AI testing support structures
- Art. 85Right to lodge a complaint with a market surveillance authority
- Art. 86Right to explanation of individual decision-making
- Art. 87Reporting of infringements and protection of reporting persons
- Art. 88Enforcement of the obligations of providers of general-purpose AI models
- Art. 89Monitoring actions
- Art. 90Alerts of systemic risks by the scientific panel
- Art. 91Power to request documentation and information
- Art. 92Power to conduct evaluations
- Art. 93Power to request measures
- Art. 94Procedural rights of economic operators of the general-purpose AI model
- Art. 102Amendment to Regulation (EC) No 300/2008
- Art. 103Amendment to Regulation (EU) No 167/2013
- Art. 104Amendment to Regulation (EU) No 168/2013
- Art. 105Amendment to Directive 2014/90/EU
- Art. 106Amendment to Directive (EU) 2016/797
- Art. 107Amendment to Regulation (EU) 2018/858
- Art. 108Amendments to Regulation (EU) 2018/1139
- Art. 109Amendment to Regulation (EU) 2019/2144
- Art. 110Amendment to Directive (EU) 2020/1828
- Art. 111AI systems already placed on the market or put into service and general-purpose AI models already placed on the marked
- Art. 112Evaluation and review
- Art. 113Entry into force and application
AI Act Article 46
Derogation from conformity assessment procedure
1.
By way of derogation from Article 43 and upon a duly justified request, any market surveillance authority may authorise the placing on the market or the putting into service of specific high-risk AI systems within the territory of the Member State concerned, for exceptional reasons of public security or the protection of life and health of persons, environmental protection or the protection of key industrial and infrastructural assets. That authorisation shall be for a limited period while the necessary conformity assessment procedures are being carried out, taking into account the exceptional reasons justifying the derogation. The completion of those procedures shall be undertaken without undue delay.
2.
In a duly justified situation of urgency for exceptional reasons of public security or in the case of specific, substantial and imminent threat to the life or physical safety of natural persons, law-enforcement authorities or civil protection authorities may put a specific high-risk AI system into service without the authorisation referred to in paragraph 1, provided that such authorisation is requested during or after the use without undue delay. If the authorisation referred to in paragraph 1 is refused, the use of the high-risk AI system shall be stopped with immediate effect and all the results and outputs of such use shall be immediately discarded.
3.
The authorisation referred to in paragraph 1 shall be issued only if the market surveillance authority concludes that the high-risk AI system complies with the requirements of Section 2. The market surveillance authority shall inform the Commission and the other Member States of any authorisation issued pursuant to paragraphs 1 and 2. This obligation shall not cover sensitive operational data in relation to the activities of law-enforcement authorities.
4.
Where, within 15 calendar days of receipt of the information referred to in paragraph 3, no objection has been raised by either a Member State or the Commission in respect of an authorisation issued by a market surveillance authority of a Member State in accordance with paragraph 1, that authorisation shall be deemed justified.
5.
Where, within 15 calendar days of receipt of the notification referred to in paragraph 3, objections are raised by a Member State against an authorisation issued by a market surveillance authority of another Member State, or where the Commission considers the authorisation to be contrary to Union law, or the conclusion of the Member States regarding the compliance of the system as referred to in paragraph 3 to be unfounded, the Commission shall, without delay, enter into consultations with the relevant Member State. The operators concerned shall be consulted and have the possibility to present their views. Having regard thereto, the Commission shall decide whether the authorisation is justified. The Commission shall address its decision to the Member State concerned and to the relevant operators.
6.
Where the Commission considers the authorisation unjustified, it shall be withdrawn by the market surveillance authority of the Member State concerned.
7.
For high-risk AI systems related to products covered by Union harmonisation legislation listed in Section A of Annex I, only the derogations from the conformity assessment established in that Union harmonisation legislation shall apply.
